Home Lightbox Zaka Ashraf Ousted from PCB Again

Zaka Ashraf Ousted from PCB Again

by AFP
Arif Ali—AFP

Arif Ali—AFP

Pakistan Cricket Board to be run by 11-member interim committee.

Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif on Monday removed the country’s cricket chief Zaka Ashraf in the latest twist to the long-running saga dogging the national board.

It is the second time in less than a year that Ashraf has been unseated as chairman of the Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB), which will be run for now by an 11-strong interim committee appointed by Sharif.

Ashraf’s removal by a court order in May last year due to doubts over his election kicked off a series of legal challenges that critics say has damaged the sport in Pakistan. A notice from the prime minister, who is also patron of the PCB, confirmed Ashraf’s removal.

“Prime Minister has removed Ashraf from his post as PCB chairman and has appointed a 11-man interim committee to run cricket affairs,” said Irfanullah Khan, lawyer for Inter-Provincial Committee (IPC). “The PM has amended the PCB constitution, under which the decision of Ashraf’s removal was made.” The IPC runs sports affairs in the country and last week sent a summary on Ashraf’s removal to the P.M.

The committee appointed journalist Najam Sethi—the interim chairman before Ashraf was reinstated—as chairman of the new body. “Our first task will be to form a new constitution under which elections could be held for PCB chairman,” Sethi told reporters. “We have to restore the prestige of Pakistan cricket, which is left isolated and made a minority through a failure at the International Cricket Council (ICC) meeting.”

The reasons for Ashraf’s removal are still unknown but sources pointed to Ashraf’s failure to give Pakistan a strong voice at a crucial ICC meeting in Singapore on Saturday. The ICC approved a controversial revamp at the meeting, which gave major powers and revenues to the so-called ‘Big Three’ of world cricket—India, Australia and England.

Ashraf, who had been due to announce a replacement for Dav Whatmore as head coach for the national team, insisted he was still chairman. “I have yet to see the notification,” he told reporters in Lahore, where he was attending a book launch. “If I am removed I will consult my lawyers to decide the course of action.”

The interim committee has the power to select a chairman, with journalist Najam Sethi seen as likely to regain the post. After Ashraf’s sacking in May 2013, Sethi was appointed as chairman of the PCB, but his tenure hit snags after another court ruling curtailed his powers.

Sharif in October imposed an ad-hoc setup on the PCB and Sethi took over as chairman of an interim committee. That changed again when a two-man division bench of the Islamabad high court reinstated Ashraf last month.

The IPC appealed against Ashraf’s reinstatement in the Supreme Court but withdrew the challenge after the court said that Sharif, as PCB patron, had the power to nominate anyone as PCB chairman, a guidance that led to Ashraf’s removal once more. The PCB chairmanship has been a topic of controversy ever since the board’s inception in 1948, with the ruling political party of the day generally giving the post to one of their supporters.

Related Articles

1 comment

amjad February 12, 2014 - 10:02 pm

Basic primitive doctrine of ‘equality before law’ and ‘equal protection of law’ as well as basic fundamental rule of ‘principles of natural justice’ is that any so called alleged accused person can’t be condemned unheard …else it is simply an arbitrariness of authority. Nobody can be served with dismissal notice arbitrarily without giving oppotunity to defend himself!!!. The person should be given a ‘show cause’ notice first (audi alteram partem) before his dismissal!!!!………………. This is basics. …………………. even novice knows about it. Hence dismissal notification of Zaka Ashraf ought to set aside actually in one hearing!!!!! ………………… Else this is actually a dictatorship and abuse of power and such dismissal is unconstitutional. I believe the pakistan’s constitution has provisions of equality … else constitution itself is not in conformity with internationally recognized norms… and then even Mushaarraf would be innocent then if constitution does not have any provisions as to ‘equality before law’ and ‘nobody above law’ etc!


Leave a Comment