Reforms favor skilled, English-speakers and are unlikely to attract much support from Congress
U.S. President Donald Trump called on Thursday for radical immigration reform to favor skilled, English-speaking workers over the poorly educated and shut the door on “frivolous” asylum claimants.
The reforms, announced in a Rose Garden speech, would be the first major change to the system in decades and would fundamentally pivot from the U.S. tradition of welcoming “your poor, your huddled masses,” as the poem inscribed on the Statue of Liberty puts it. “Currently 66 percent of legal immigrants come here based on random chance,” Trump said. Instead, a points system grading applicants’ readiness to contribute to the U.S. economy would attract “top talent.”
There is little chance that the business-minded Republican president’s ideas will get anywhere in Congress, where immigration is seen as a politically toxic subject, particularly ahead of 2020 legislative and presidential elections. “This dead-on-arrival plan is not a remotely serious proposal,” the Democratic speaker of the lower house of Congress, Nancy Pelosi, said. But for Trump, who has made building walls on the Mexican border a keystone of his first term, the proposals will nevertheless play to his base as he seeks re-election.
He said the plan would make U.S. immigration “the envy of the modern world” by attracting the highly qualified, in line with what he said were the more competitive policies used by Australia and Canada. “We cherish the open door that we want to create for our country. But a big proportion of those immigrants must come in through merit and skill,” he said.
“The biggest change we make is to increase the proportion of highly skilled immigration from 12 percent to 57 percent, and we’d like to even see if we can go higher,” Trump said.
Under the proposed reforms, immigrants will also be “required to learn English and to pass a civics exam prior to admission,” Trump said.
The U.S. president also took aim at what he said were abuses of the country’s asylum system, which is struggling to cope with large numbers of Central Americans who say they are fleeing gang violence in some of the world’s most dangerous countries. “Our nation has a proud history of affording protection to those fleeing government persecutions,” Trump said. “Unfortunately, legitimate asylum seekers are being displaced by those lodging frivolous claims.”
Trump’s ideas are so unlikely to get a vote in Congress that analysts saw his policy splash as more of a campaign speech than a serious bid to get legislation enacted.
Republican Senator Lindsey Graham, a key ally of Trump in Congress, signaled his lack of enthusiasm by releasing his own proposal on Wednesday and commenting: “The White House’s plan is not designed to become law, [while] this is designed to become law.”
For politicians on the right, Trump’s plan fails because it does not seek to diminish overall immigration numbers. On the left, it is dead on arrival because it ignores a drive to give legal status to people brought into the country illegally as young children, known as “Dreamers.”
Pelosi said Trump’s idea of successful applicants was patronizing and out of touch. “Are they saying most of the people who have ever come to the United States in the history of our country are without merit, because they don’t have an engineering degree?” she asked.
One Democratic congressman from California, Jimmy Gomez, called Trump’s plan “ignorant” and “against our values.”
Cornell University Law School professor Stephen Yale-Loehr, an immigration expert, said Trump’s proposal “has some ideas worth considering,” but is so incomplete in addressing the broader complications in the system that Congress will not take it seriously.”
As Yale-Loehr noted, immigration reform has bedeviled Washington for years and is even less likely to see progress in Congress ahead of elections. “Immigration reform is always difficult. Congress hasn’t revised our legal immigration system since 1990,” he said.